Egalitarianism (the belief that all men are equal) faces many challenges on a day-to-day basis. Some Men are taller than others, some are able to run faster and jump higher, while others have better looks or more natural gregarious personalities...
Then there are the more dramatic inequalities present in mankind, such as those born deformed, crippled or mentally impaired. For these people we find moral umbrage in the use of the term
intrinsic equality: that general belief in the inherent value of all living human beings. Of course this as well runs into challenges as we continue to apply abortion on the notion that the definition of human being can itself be, well, defined. And in
acknowledging some inequalities, we are quite comfortable. None of us attempt to hide away or deflect the knowledge that a quadriplegic is not likely to score the game-winning touchdown in a football game any time soon, nor is a sufferer of Down syndrome apt to become the pilot of an F-16 jet fighter. And so the more we actually think about the concept of Equality, the more we are forced to choose between either junking it or deifying it. Many it seems have chosen the later.
By deifying an ideology we remove its precepts from the
exposure of challenge by declaring those who challenge its precepts (irregardless of their knowledge) as heretics.
Case in point, Dr. James Watson, the Nobel Prize winning, co-discoverer of the double helix structure of DNA, pulled a Martin Luther by openly (though casually) challenging the dogma of equality, when he said in an interview that he was,
"'inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa' because 'all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours—whereas all the testing says not really.' "
-Charlotte Hunt-Grubbe, TimesOnLine. October 14, 2007
Naturally, not long after, he was labeled a heretic and forced to recant. He gave up his position at the Cold Springs Harbor genetics laboratory and apparently went into hibernation.
Perhaps he is awaiting the Dooms Day coming about by those who continue to deny reality.
The Old Media, of course, feigned shock at Dr. Watson’s pronouncements and promptly dug up a few scientists who also (on record) feigned shock.
Then, silence for a while…
...Enter The New York Times
...genetic information is slipping out of the laboratory and into everyday life, carrying with it the inescapable message that people of different races have different DNA. Ancestry tests tell customers what percentage of their genes are from Asia, Europe, Africa and the Americas. The heart-disease drug BiDil is marketed exclusively to African-Americans, who seem genetically predisposed to respond to it. Jews are offered prenatal tests for genetic disorders rarely found in other ethnic groups....Certain superficial traits like skin pigmentation have long been presumed to be genetic. But the ability to pinpoint their DNA source makes the link between genes and race more palpable. And on mainstream blogs, in college classrooms and among the growing community of ancestry test-takers, it is prompting the question of whether more profound differences may also be attributed to DNA.....many geneticists, wary of fueling discrimination and worried that speaking openly about race could endanger support for their research, are loath to discuss the social implications of their findings.....“There are clear differences between people of different continental ancestries,” said Marcus W. Feldman, a professor of biological sciences at Stanford University. “It’s not there yet for things like I.Q., but I can see it coming....Such discussions are among thousands that followed the geneticist James D. Watson's assertion last month that Africans are innately less intelligent than other races. Dr. Watson, a Nobel Prize winner, subsequently apologized and quit his post at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island.
But the incident has added to uneasiness about whether society is prepared to handle the consequences of science that may eventually reveal appreciable differences between races in the genes that influence socially important traits.
The New York Times November 11 2007 by Amy Harmon
This was no revelation of course, as many experts have made the same fact based assertions for years. Books such as Why Race Matters,
by Michael Levin, Ph.D., Race Differences in Intelligence by Richard Lynn, Ph.D., Race, Evolution, and Behavior, by Philippe Rushton, Ph.D, as well as the works by Prof. Arthur Jensen and Prof. Linda Gottfredson (among a host of others) have long held that what our own (and our societies) experiences tells us about race, is confirmed by scientific research.
Never the less, the truth is not always easily accepted even when it is acknowledged. Thus this article from the Washington Post-owned webzine Slate.com,
The New York Times told readers that when Watson implied "that black Africans are less intelligent than whites, he hadn't a scientific leg to stand on." I wish these assurances were true. They aren't. Tests do show an IQ deficit, not just for Africans relative to Europeans, but for Europeans relative to Asians. Economic and cultural theories have failed to explain most of the pattern, and there's strong preliminary evidence that part of it is genetic. It's time to prepare for the possibility that equality of intelligence, in the sense of racial averages on tests, will turn out not to be true....Among white Americans, the average IQ, as of a decade or so ago, was 103. Among Asian-Americans, it was 106. Among Jewish Americans, it was 113. Among Latino Americans, it was 89. Among African-Americans, it was 85....How could genes cause an IQ advantage? The simplest pathway is head size. I thought head measurement had been discredited as Eurocentric pseudoscience. I was wrong. In fact, it's been bolstered by MRI. On average, Asian-American kids have bigger brains than white American kids, who in turn have bigger brains than black American kids. This is true even though the order of body size and weight runs in the other direction. The pattern holds true throughout the world and persists at death, as measured by brain weight. I know, it sounds crazy. But if you approach the data from other directions, you get the same results. The more black and white scores differ on a test, the more performance on that test correlates with head size and "g," a measure of the test's emphasis on general intelligence. You can debate the reality of g, but you can't debate the reality of head size. And when you compare black and white kids who score the same on IQ tests, their average difference in head circumference is zero.
Scientists have already identified genes that influence brain size and vary by continent......Nature isn't stupid. If Africans, Asians, and Europeans evolved different genes, the reason is that their respective genes were suited to their respective environments.
On average, compared with whites, blacks mature more quickly in the womb, are born earlier, and develop teeth, strength, and dexterity earlier. They sit, crawl, walk, and dress themselves earlier. They reach sexual maturity faster, and they have better eyesight. On each of these measures, East Asians lag whites and blacks. In exchange, East Asians get longer lives and bigger brains.
How this happened isn't clear. Everyone agrees that the three populations separated 40,000 to 100,000 years ago. Even critics of racial IQ genetics accept the idea that through natural selection, environmental differences may have caused abilities such as distance running to become more common in some populations than in others. Possibly, genes for cognitive complexity became so crucial in some places that nature favored them over genes for developmental speed and vision.
-William Saletan, slate.com, Nov. 18, 2007
How does this affect our society?
One needs only to compare and contrast the civilizations created by the different races and the effects upon their indigenous continents and the world around them. Europeans continue to advance in Medicine, Science, Technology, Art and Engineering. Europe has been the epicenter of human progress for the past 3,000 years, with her peoples having fanned out across the globe, establishing vast Empires and imposing her values upon (and bringing her technologies to), the denizens encountered. Africa, on the other hand, remains in a state of Arrested Development. Her sons and daughters remain in a state of perpetual poverty, civil-wars, crime, corruption and chaos. Her peoples have set foot beyond her shores only at the insistence of Berber, Arab, European and Egyptian slave traders (among others) and conquerors.
The average European IQ, 100
The average African IQ, 70.
And of Environmental factors and racial intermarriage, the facts remain equally grim.
Centuries of living in a white society, a survival of the fittest type transplant into the New World which helped weed out the less intelligent, and an average admix of roughly 20 to 25%+ European DNA has raised the transplanted African's IQ from 70 to 84 in America.
This is similar to the Latin American Mestizo (a mixture of some European –mostly Spanish and Portuguese- with the indigenous Indian populations). Mestizos make up roughly 60% of Mexico’s population, with pureblooded Indians comprising 30% and White Spaniards following with around 9%. Mexico’s national IQ is around 88.
And many Latin American nations are taking advantage of our
Open Doors policy on immigration to rid themselves of their own troublesome masses.
Already, (due to unprecedented mass immigration) this has created two classes here in America; at the top, Whites and east Asians averaging (together) an IQ of about 102, at the bottom, Blacks and Hispanics averaging (together) an IQ of about 86. The bottom caste however is outpacing the top in birth rates dramatically, as the top caste has fewer and fewer children. Even if there should be mass intermarriage between these two castes, the volume of the lower against the higher, will produce a future generation whose IQ will be around 90. A full 10 points below the average American of 1969 (when America was nearly 90% white) when a White man walked on the moon.
And with this unprecedented change in demographics come the vices and virtues of the Third World. Be they crime, poverty, corruption, gangs, disease and the like, America, it would seem, is casting off her inheritance of European Blood and the Civilization which it favors, for a
"coffee colored world", where every day is a regression to the stone age.
...